terça-feira, 12 de novembro de 2013

Capitalism: a lovely approach

Yes, there are many approaches for this thing called Capitalism. Here is the lovely approach: a love story about the capitalism.
Full of irony, Michael Moore shows to us, the deffects and the stupid decisions made in the american policy, but that can be adapetd in a different way to all the Capitalist countries. This movie shows how we are making the same mistakes almost since the beginning of the human societies, and how we still allow them to be make.
It's impressive to see the numbers of this disaster, and how much did we loose and are we loosing with this system called capitalism.
Should we need to review this capitalist paradigm? Decide yourself:

sábado, 9 de novembro de 2013

Ireland: the Power of Finance

The Celtic Tiger still exist?

The crisis we are facing these days in the world, is a crisis that started in teh financial sector. We are seeing again the importance of this sector and its strength: a crisis that started in the financial sector is afecting all the economy with many consequences in the persons, the companies and in the Governments. But the objective of this message it's not talk about this consequences.
I will talk about a country where the financial sector had one of the biggest growths and penetrations in the economy and in the country.
In 1960 Ireland was one of the poorest economies in the Western Europe. And until the beggining of the 90's the evolution was too small, as we can see in this graph:

Based on the book: "O crash de 2010" from Santiago Becerra
The irish economy presented a deficit, was poor and based in immigration until de 90's when it suffered a big transformation. In the beginning of the 90's it was more than obvious that the current economic model wasn't viable anymore.
And as we can see in this graphic, the new economic brought good consequences for the irish economic performance.

Based on the book: "O crash de 2010" from Santiago Becerra

The stunning growth of the irish economy was an unique case all over the Europe in this period. From a goner until the beginning of the 90's, Ireland achieved the second higher average GDP pc in the European Union, just behind Luxembourg. How was possible to an economy like Ireland to have such great sucess. The big changes started in 1987. The new-elected government started a new politics based on 3 big principles:
- the public expenses were drastically cut;
- the competence was promoted and encouraged in many subsectors;
- with the EU permission, the irish government reduced the tax for the companie's benefits;

And the consequences were just like how the government predicted:
  • The country attracted a lot of foreign investment, specially from the USA, using the advantage of being in a geographic position between North-America and the continental Europe. From 1997 to 2006, Ireland received about 88 000 millions of dollars of foreign investment - something incredible for such small country - . The investment was mostly based to the production of products and services for exportation.
  • The low level of the public expenses;
  • The efficient use of the european funds;

All these conditions led to a decrease in the unemployment rate and the entry of many immigrants specially from Poland, Russia and the Baltic countries. We maybe be surprised for such great sucess and we are led to think that, specially after the year 2000, the way of life should be so great all over the country. But the country was suffering from a big problem: the illusion created by the statistical average.
The enormous agregated GDP in a small country, produces a high GDPpc but hides the extrem realities, some of them very dramatic. Like many other examples in the History, the statistical data was hiding many economic and social problems. Outside the big centersm the scenario was very different from what we immagine in a country with such high GDP: the bad infra-struture quality, the shortage of many essential goods and services. Of course this reflects how the government was spending the public income - the level of public expenditure was much lower comparing to the GDPpc level - . So, if the most part of the population don't have a level of life according to the level of GDPpc, this means only one thing: this level of income doesn't arrive to the populations' day life.
How is it possible? Thanks to the way how this income level in obtained: witth a decrease in taxes and low public expenses, together with the concentration of the activities and application of GDP almost all near to Dublin.
But, despite the unbalanced distribution of the income, the average income of the irish population increased, together with the growing indebtedness.
During this period, the population bought more and biggest houses, and sold those they had.
This mecanism was working well until 2006. The activity in the housing market started the slowndown and arrived the stagnation in the Summer of 2007.
The irish families began experiencing serious financial problems, due to the mortgage debt and the increase of the interest rates.
And across the country it's possible to see the wrong projects, where the money was applied.
Now, we can see why the Celtic Tiger is more a myth than a reality.
The irish government decreased the taxes, and together with the european funds, increased the GDP. However the population didn't take advantage of this good situation.
The popualtion's income increased because it was in a bad situation comparing with the rest of the Western Europe, and because of the households' endibtness.
The celtic tiger is more speculation than reality: the hiper consume, the excessive debt and the increase in the investment and importance of the tertiary sector, sooner brought strong structural problems for the irish economy.
In the beginning of the current crisis, Ireland was suffering the consequences of the "financial engineerings" made all these years, and of the extrem external indebtedness.
The predictness for the irish economy are not  very encouraging.

sexta-feira, 8 de novembro de 2013

The great euro-crash of 2012

We can say that the official start of the current crisis was in 2008. But since then, the crisis is suffering of many stages and many mutations. What started as a crisis only in the financial sector, quickly spread to another sectors, arriving to the States.
2012 was a terrible year for all the world but with stongest consequences for Europe, specilaly for the eeuro-zone. We watched many news about that, and each one much more worse than the previous. But what really happened in 2012 in all our economies? And how do we became to this situation?
Here is a video that tries to explain that.



terça-feira, 12 de março de 2013

A brief history of religion

Today began the conclave that will elect the greatest religious leader of today. The resignation of Pope Benedict XVI stunned the world and raised troubling questions about the future of religion. However, despite the rise of atheism especially in the Western world, the truth is that religion still plays an important role in current human societies and, despite the growing laicisism, religion continues to interfere in economic and political life.
Everyday important actions and decisions are made around the world, based on faith and / or religious beliefs.
But if there is who still be guided by religion rather, there are more and more voices that question the need for religions exist.
This documentary is an peculiar approach about the religious phenomenon at present and its connection with people's lives, trying to answer some pertinent questions and show a point of view not very conventional. But I think it is good to be seen by believers and non-believers.


segunda-feira, 11 de março de 2013

A brief History of our World

It not takes really 2 hours - only 1:27:59 - but is an interesting overview that shows us how we came to there. What was the world before the Men Era?And before de actual societies?
Here is an explanation of that!


Eurovision: in preparation for Malmö 2013 (VI)

Moving to the South I will now talk about two countries that were 2 big surprises last year: one very positive but unfortunately another very negative.

SWITZERLAND AND HEILSARMEE


Let start with the biggest negative surprise of last year's festival. The swiss song and performance was one of the best acts last year in Baku. Unfortunately
This year Switzerland back to give us an unexpected choice and far from being the best in your music festival, is at least the most controversial.
Starting with the group's name 'Heilsarmee' that means "Salvation Army". This name has a strong political connotation and therefore will have to be changed before the festival, at the express request of the EBU. Moreover the group is associated with homophobia and xenophobic ideologies.
As for the group itself, the idea of ​​gathering in a group people of several generations is interesting. However, despite the music being different than usually is seen in Eurovision, I don't think that has sufficient capacity to attract juris and much less the public. The music does not have a single high moment than can make it more attractive.
As for the competition, this year Switzerland again had some interesting proposals that would be much better than the winner, including Nicolas Fraissinet and also Melissa. I thought this year Chiara Dubey was worse than last year, but still would be a better choice than the winners.
I think the idea of the decision only based on televoting not proved be the right one.
Of the countries that usually give (few) points to Switzerland will vote this year in the same semifinal in which it participates, Malta, Germany and Finland.
Given the current low quality of competition, there are still strong hopes of  Switzerland qualifies for the finals in Switzerland.

ALBANIA AND ADRIAN LULGJURAJ & BLEDAR SEJKO


Last year Albania was a big positive surprise in Eurovision. After the song and artist had been revealed, this country was always among the last palces in the opinion of most fans. But surprisingly, after the revelation of the official videoclip, the opinions started to change drastically. Rona eventually became a great success, qualifying for the final in 2nd place and finishing in 5th place in the grand final. In fact Albania submitted its best voice ever in the festival and this time the judges were on the side of Rona.
But I have my doubts that this year Albania will have the same success. Fans returned to quote this song very badly, but I can not believe they will receive much support on the part of juries. The music has an initial part relatively interesting, but the quality worsens when the singer starts singing and continues to deteriorate along the song. Unfortunately the competition also failed to match: the quality of the albanian musical festival was much lower than last year.
In the semifinal this year, Albania will have the three countries that usually give more points to it: Switzerland, Macedonia and Greece. This may be sufficient for the passage of Albania to final.

terça-feira, 5 de março de 2013

Melodifestivalen 2013: Who will win?


Here I am another year to ask your opinion on who will win this Saturday, the Melodifesivalen 2013 and will represent the host country in May.
You can vote until the 9th for your favorite. But remember that only one vote is allowed per day.
See below for a recap of the finalists.

Go here to vote: http://poll.pollcode.com/3klv8w

Aqui estou eu mais um ano para pedir a vossa opinião sobre quem ganhará este sábado o Melodifesivalen 2013 e representará o país anfitrião em Maio.
Poderá votar até ao dia 9 no seu favorito. Mas lembre-se que só é permitido um voto por dia.
Veja em baixo o resumo dos finalistas.

Aceda aqui para votar: http://poll.pollcode.com/3klv8w

Eccomi qui un altro anno, per chiedere il vostro parere su chi vincerà questo sabato, il Melodifesivalen 2013 e rappresenterà il paese ospitante in maggio.
Potete votare fino al 9 per il vostro preferito. Ma ricordate che è consentito un solo voto al giorno.
Vedi sotto per un riepilogo dei finalisti.

Andate qui per votare: http://poll.pollcode.com/3klv8w