domingo, 23 de março de 2014

The History of Gregorian Chant

The Gregorian Chant is the official chant of the catholic church since the Roman Rite.
It's a monocordic chant sung in unison without any instrument (musical accompaniment). Despite that today the catholic liturgy has more kind of sacred chant, it still saying that the Gregorian chant is the best way to connect the Man with God, the best way to express the prayers by the music.
an example of the one of the oldest notations of the Gregorian Chant
an example of the one of the oldest notations of the Gregorian Chant
So, let's have a brief look about the History of this chant.
First the name: it's called Gregorian thanks to the Pope Gregory (590 - 604) who colected, selected, ordered the melodies heard in teh churches these dyas, making also some of them. Around the 12th century, it started to be called as plainchant, that comes from the latin "cantus plenus".
the first songs in Gregorian derivate from the songs sang in the jewish liturgy, including influences from the polytheist religions from the Roman Empire.
Using the existing melodies, the catholic church adopted tehm using the texts specially from the Bible, but also form the tradition. Until the 9th cnetury all the songs were transmited only oraly, which means a very hard work to memorize the songs.
So, to help the singers (the monks), in the end of the 9th century, the first music sheets appeared. The different kinds of notation appeared in orser to help to sing and to improve their capacity to sing new pieces without memorize them.
In the 10th century come the sript and the Dry lines drawn. In the beginning of the 10th century it's possible to determine the position for the semitones by the introduction of two lines: one red for the "Fa" and the other yellow for the "Do", and the use of letters for the clef: "C" and "F". But the changes didn't stop there.
In the second-half of the 11th century appeared the tetragramma, and the most perfect diastemasia is achieved. With all this evolution, it becomes possible to read a piece without a master.

An example of the quadratic notation.
An example of the quadratic notation.
But, meanwhile emerges the polyphonic melodie and the Gregorian chant started to die in the end of the 13th century. The Gregorian chant emerged again in 1845 when Danjou, an organist in Paris, has found the bilingual manuscrit of Montpellier. Since then, there wew many initiatives to study the ancient pieces of Gregorian chant and to introduce them again in the liturgy, thanks to the help of many personalities like: Fr Lambillote, Don Guéranger, Don Pothier, Don A. Mocquereau, Don J. Gajard, Cardinal Pizzardo, the Popes Pius X, Pius XI and Pius XII and the monks from Solesmes that published many works about this theme.
Despite the high number of notations, the most used now is the quadratic. And, since in the time where the Gregorian was born and diffused the communications were so difficult, we can find now in Europe many kinds of ways to write the Gregorian Chant.
The most important, just because it's the most studied now, is the notation from St. Gall, that emerged in the St. Gall monastery, in a region now in Switzerland.

St. Gall Monastery

St. Gall Monastery

sexta-feira, 21 de março de 2014

Eurovision: Destination - Copenhagen 2014 (ALL SONGS)

This week the last songs were revealed. Here they are. What's your favorite?

SEMIFINAL I:

ALBANIA:
Artist - Hersi
Song - "One night's anger" (English)

ARMENIA:
Artist - Aram MP3
Song - "Not Alone" (English)

AZERBAIJAN:
Artist - Dilara Kazimova
Song - "Start a fire" (English)


ESTONIA:
Artist - Tanja
Song - "Amazing Life" (English)


ICELAND:
Artist - Pollapönk
Song - "No prejudice" (English)


LATVIA:
Artist - Aarzemnieki
Song - "Cake to bake" (English)

RUSSIA:
Artist - The Tolmachevy Sisters
Song - "Shine" (English)

SWEDEN:
Artist - Sanna Nielsen
Song - "Undo" (English)

BELGIUM
Artist - Axel Hirsoux
Song - "Mother" (English)


HUNGARY:
Artist - András Kállay-Saunders
Song - "Running" (English)


MOLDOVA:
Artist - Cristina Scarlat
Song - "Wild Soul" (English)


MONTENEGRO:
Artist - Sergej Ćetković
Song - ""Moj svijet" (Мој свијет)" (Montenegrin)


THE NETHERLANDS:
Artist - The Common Linnets
Song - "Calm After the Storm" (English)

PORTUGAL
Artist - Suzy
Song - Quero ser tua (Portuguese)


SAN MARINO
Artist - Valentina Monetta
Song - Maybe (Forse) (English)

UKRAINE:
Artist - Maria Yaremchuk
Song - Tick-tock (English)


SEMIFINAL 2

AUSTRIA
Artist - Conchita Wurst
Song - "Rise like a Phoenix" (English)


GEORGIA
Artist - The Shin and Mariko
Song - "Three Minutes to Earth" (English)


ISRAEL
Artist - Mei Finegold
Song - "Same Heart" (English, Hebrew)


LITHUANIA
Artist - Vilija Matačiūnaitė
Song - "Attention" (English)



MALTA
Artist - Firelight
Song - "Coming Home" (English)


NORWAY
Artist - Carl Espen
Song - "Silent Storm" (English)


POLAND
Artist - Donatan & Cleo
Song - "My Słowianie" (English, Polish)

BELARUS
Artist - TEO
Song - "Cheesecake" (English)

FINLAND:
Artist - Softengine
Song - "Something Better" (English)

GREECE
Artist - Freaky Fortune feat. Riskykidd
Song - "Rise Up" (English)


IRELAND
Artist - Can-Linn feat. Kasey Smith
Song - "Heartbeart" (English)

MACEDONIA
Artist - Tijana
Song - "To the Sky" (English)

ROMANIA
Artist - Paula Seling & OVI
Song - "Miracle" (English)

SLOVENIA
Artist - Tinkara Kovač
Song - Round and Round (English, Slovene)


SWITZERLAND
Artist - Sebalter
Song - Hunter of Stars (English)


BIG 5 + HOST

DENMARK
Artist - Basim
Song - "Cliche Love Song" (English)


FRANCE
Artist - TWIN TWIN
Song - "Moustache" (French)


GERMANY
Artist - Elaiza
Song - "Is it Right" (English)

ITALY
Artist - Emma Marrone
Song - La mia citta (Italian)


SPAIN
Artist - Ruth Lorenzo
Song - "Dancing in the Rain" (English, Spanish)

UNITED KINGDOM
Artist - Molly
Song - "Children of the Universe" (English)


LET'S START THE SOW!!!!!

segunda-feira, 17 de março de 2014

The freedom of press... the freedom to live

Font: International Politics and http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php

The degree of freedom of the press can say many things about the conditions in a specific country. More even than we can immagine at a first analysis.
And for this scenario we can see that the world situation is not so good as the most optimistic viewers could immagine. And if we associate the freedom of the press to the economic position some countries have in the global context, the scenario could be even more worrying.
But we first need to see what is and what are the implications related to the degree of freedom of the press. We can see the freedom of the press as the possibility of the press to write, publish or show to the people, their vision of the what is happening in the homeland and in all the world, without any concerns about possible punishments. This means for example to turn on the TV at news time and see the news about anything about my home country or about another country, and see the information the most similar possible to the reality, without any deliberate interference to change the reality. The same if I decide to read a newspaper, to listen the radio or any other way to receive any kind of information.
From a country where the freedom is higher, this could see something so simple and basic that it's difficult to imagine a violation of this elementar people's right. The people must have the right to receive the real and accurate information about any subject. As citizens and members of the society, using the local, regional and global goods, making their own contribution for the society's wealth and welfare, the people have of course the right to receive the information in good quality about anything they want to know. And from the side of the people that provide the information, the same rules can be used. The people must have the freedom of search, make and turn out public the information. The right to know, it's seen as a basic right that anyone should have. Because in the countries where the degree of freedom is higher, only with an access of good and reliable information, the citizens can make the best choices and be more productive, efficient and effective for the society and economy. Only with the right information, the citizens can achieve their goals - so, the individual rights are above of the common rights in these countries - .
Let's see the other side. The countries with the lower degree of freedom of the press, have their own reasons which for them are the right ones. If the information is available for the public without having first an official authority to analyse it and to eliminate some information, or only parts of it, or the way it is transmitted, the people can make the wrong decisions, can be less productive, less efficient and effective, and can be a threat for the Government, the public institutions and for the society and the country itself. So, the common interest is above everything else.
I can present thousands of arguments defending and rejecting both ways of thinking. But we need to analyse something else.
A lack of information will never teach the people how to do the best choices and the countries with the higher degree of freedom are the most developed countries, with a higher respect of the human rights, and where the welfare is higher and the peace and institutional stability is higher.
And the freedom of the press has also an impact in the economic activity, in the policies decisions, in the public system, in the cultural, ideological and values' changes,
So, it seems that there must be a positive relation between degree of freedom and development. But this map shows a concerning scenario.
Let's analyse it by parts:
- Most developed countries: all of them, Western Europe, North America, Japan, Australia and New Zeland, are in the best two positions of the scale. And despite the problems, many of them related to the economic crisis, or politic misunderstoods, the trend would be to itensify the increase in the degree of freedom.
- Emmerging economies / especially the BRIC's: it's impossible of course to analyse our world without taking into account the countries' economic role. As I explained here, the emerging economies, especially the BRIC's have an important role in the global economy, and the importance will continue to increase in the future. So, seeing that in almost all of these countries, especially the BRIC's an the emerging economies in Asia, that have been increasing their power in the global context, the degree of freedom is very low, is a matter of concern of global institutions.
- Less developed countries: especially Africa, this map shows the opposite side - that a low degree of freedom is an impediment for a healthy growth and development of the country and society.
What lesson can we take from this map? That the world has along way to go, and that the threat of a reverse in the improvement is a constant presence, which is harming the people's welfare and quality of life.

sexta-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2014

Eurovision: Destination - Copenhagen 2014 (II)

Here we are in a very busy month for the Eurovision path to Copenhagen. Many countries will reveal their artists and songs this month.
Here I analyze more two countries, curiously both will be represented in Denmark with a band.

Finland and Softengine

Despite the winning in 2006 with the 3rd most voted song ever in the contest, Finland is among the lest
successful in the scandinavian "block". Even missing only 2 times the grand final after 2006, Finland never was in the TOP10 or closer to that.
Last year, this scandinavian country brought a very funny song and a very controversial performance. But, despite all the controversy the song came in 24th position.
This year Finland brings a different song from last years. In the national final there were some very good songs, especially the songs that finished in the TOP3. All these three songs could be a very good choice for the contest but, despite many people prefere the second ranked Mikko Pohjola, I prefere the winning song.
Let's start to analyze the 2nd and 3rd ranked. The band MIAU is probably the most original from all three, but I think it's not the most adequate for this kind of contest and could be very misunderstood, especially by the juries.
As for the 2nd ranked, he has probably the best voice in the TOP3 (and maybe among all the candidates), but the sing is not so memorable , and this could be a disadvantage in the time to vote.
And finally, my comment to the winner. I like this kind of performances on the Eurovision: a band singing pop-rock songs. The song probably doesn't bring us anything new, could be similar to many others, but at least it's a style that the most part of the people like to listen, and if they keep the same performance in the national final, I can't find (so far, it will depend on all the competition of course) reasons for Finland miss the grand final this year. The group has the passion to give a great performance to the audience and the singer is vocaly very secure.
This year Finland will perform in the 2nd semi-final and unfortunately Finland cannot count with the countries that tend to give it more points. None of the scandinavian neighbors will vote in this semi-final and, according to the statistics the only country that tends to give more points to Finland that will vote in this semifinal will be Israel, which in the last years is not among the countris that gives more points to this Nordic country.
So, at least thank God Finland will bring a good song, able to attract votes from the countries that doesn't give points to Finland due to the neighbor block system.

Switzerland and Sebalter


Switzerland is among the countries more damaged by the current block voting system, and in the last years has had some very unfair results. However I agree with the last year result, and honestly, I hope this year Switzerland has the same destiny. The group is interesting, transmits good feeling but the song is a little far away from what could be. It's not only because of the whistles, although is the biggest reason. I think that something is missing in this song, to give it more power and to transmit all the message and emotions the song has. And the vocalist needs to pay more attention to some vocal failures during the performance. But at least was the best choice from all the finalists. Only the 2nd ranked could also have been a good choice, although the song was too average.
Switzerland doesn't have a easy life in this competition and of course this country cannot count to benefit from the political vote this year as usual. The countries that according to the statistics give more points to Switzerland and that will vote in the same semifinal are the United Kingdom, Austria and in a lower level Finland and Germany.
Well... if the artists maintain the good mood (that is probably, together with the diversity of instruments used, the best aspect of all the song and performance) in the semifinal, they could not pass to the grand final but at least will not be among the crappy swiss participations.

segunda-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2014

The emerging economies and their role in the current crisis

The emerging economies are those who are cuurently in the path between the underdevelopment and the development situation. Of course they usually have an important role in the world economy. According to the flying geese model, these economies started to receive the labour intensive industries, and are now changing to the capital intensive industries and having an important role in some sectors.
However, maybe more than never, these economies are having an important role, especially in the current crisis.
Could the current economic situation be worse without the role of these economies? Could the solution for the current crisis be in the emergent economies?
That's what we are trying to see now.

Could the exit for the current crisis be in the BRIC's economic performance?
The great performance
One of the biggest facts of the last decades is the development and the economic growth of the so called "emerging economies", especially the BRIC's: Brazil, Russia, India and China, that are now among the biggest contributors to the world economy. And their weight will increase in the next decades. And in the recent years, one factor appears: the intra-emerging economies trade. In 2005, already 50% of the trade of these countries were among them. This is the result of the improvement in the consumptions patterns and the increase in the domestic demand.
But there are other groups inside the big group of the emerging economies. And, if some of them have already an important role in the regional trade and are achieving the high-income, others are still in the beggining of their path. We can divide the emergent economies into three groups:

> the developed emergents, which includes countries with high economic growth rates, like the BRIC's, but have a long way to achieve the political and isntitucional development, and others like Portugal or South Korea which achieved a good level of industrialization but are facing some economic problems especially the middle-income trap, and in gaining a important position in the global market;
> the mono.economies, which have the productive activity extremly concentrated in one product. They can face the risk if they don't diversify their productive activity, neither take advantage of the good seasons of their mono-product;
> insufficient emergent economies, the countries which development path is still in the beggining phase. They were the countries who suffered the most with the crisis by the reasons we will se later.

So, in the beggining of the current crisis it seemed that the emergent economies will not be affected by it, or at least will suffer just a litlle bit. This idea that the economic performance of the emergent economies would be independent of the economic performance of the most developed economies, especially the USA, received many supporters, including the political leaders of the emergent economies.
So, when the current crisis started, the reactions from the emergent economies were almost nonexistent. And in  fact they had good reasons to react like that. The most developed economies could renovate their debts thanks to the credibility they had in the international markets. And of course, the emergent economies didn't have the credibility to do that. So, the only way they had to constantly renew their debts was thanks to the currency reserves accumulated by the countries in the 90's. This accumulation was the result of years of comercial surplus with the outside, which led to a reduction in the debt and in the risk of financial crisis.
However, even with these good aspects, the trade between these economies and the western economies was still about 50% in the biggenning of the current crisis. With the progress of the economic crisis, it became obvious that emerging economies would be directly affected by the crisis started in the USA.

GDP growth in the BRIC's
Source: World Bank statistics 2014

Exports growth in the BRIC's
Source: data obtained by the information available on the World Bank Statistics 2014

By these graphics is possible to see that the recession arrived to the emergent economies later, but had negative effects especially in the mono-economies, whose industrial specialization made ​​them more vulnerable to terms of trade deterioration. And even with the high cuurent accumulation, the markets were awared about what happened in the 90's, and the access to the credit became more difficult.
The second problems faced by the emergent economies, is the contraction of the international demand of the commodities (that still has an important weight in the total exportation in most of these economies). And the third is the decrease in the commodities and raw-materials prices, having especial effects in the insufficient emerging economies.
So, it seems a bad scenario for the emerging economies. However, these economies had two advantages comparing to the most developed countries. First, since they took place in the industrizliation process later, the creation and investment in financial securities which were the responsibles for the crisis, weren't so disseminated. And, since their were in the middle of the development process, the domestic market wasn't full explored like in the developed countries. So, the domestic demand was in the ascending process, and these countries could cover the decrease in the international demand, by the increase in the domestic demand. And since the big part of the population are now emerging from the poverty, they have enough income to consume the intensive labour, or low technologic products that the big part of these countries still produce.
And in three of the emerging economies, Brazil, India and especially China, they have an advantage, that can also give the opportunity to export to the most developed countries where the crisis is bigger: the so called "social dumping".
The techological assimilation, associated to the extremly low labour costs and bad work conditions, gives to China the possibility to produce and export products more sofisticated than before, at a more competitive prices than the companies in the developed economies. So, even with lower productivity, these economies can compete with the similar products produced in the developed economies, thanks to the lower prices.
Bur of course, even with the possibility to export to the developed economies with a competitive price, the emerging economies will recover faster than the others, thanks to the domestic demand. And of course the level of recovering will also depend on the government's role in these areas:
> fiscal and incentive policies;
> social programs to stimulate the domestic demand (give the opportunity to the people increase their consumption, especially for the goods that the country can't put in the external market);

The recovering of the emerging economies can in fact help the recovering of the most developed economies. But to achieve that it will be necessary the coordination of policies and procedures at the international level. The basic areas of intervention are the creation of a new finantial regulation system, the reform of the international financial system and the extension of the regulation and the penalization to the fiscal paradises.

So, as we can see in this article, the reason why the people speak more now about the emerging economies, is because the exit for the current crisis could depend a lot of their performance.

segunda-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2014

The Holocaust: a memory of the past and a lesson for the future

"If the international Jewish financiers outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the bolshevisation of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe"
(Adolf Hitler addressing the German Reichstag, 30 January 1939)


A child dying on the street in the Varsaw Gheto, during the Nazi regim
Today, 27th of January we celebrate the International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust, th day when the largest Nazi death camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau in Poland, was released by Soviet troops and the Holocaust period became officially to an end.
It was created in 1st of November of 2005 during the United Nations General Assembly resolution, in the celebration of the 40th anniversary of the end of the World War II. However, only this year I will leave a post about it, not because only this year I remember this big crime against the Human-Kind and the Human Civilization, but because last year in August I visited for the first time a concentration camp, the kz gedenkstaette Dachau, near to Munich, the first concentration camp.
And I need to say that, even with all the pictures, all the movies and all the stories, we can only realize what really was a concentration camp, when we visit one with our eyes, and we still feel the sadness, the despair and the hopeless that remains in these camps.
But, before talking about my experience, I will explain some things about the Holocaust.

Despite the years, the European continent has fresh the memory of this crime. Even the youngest generations (like myself) that were born many years after the end of the World War II know what the Holocaust was and have (at least) a vague idea of what it worked. And despite the non-involvement, it's known in all the continents, not being of course, a present memory like here in Europe.
But sometimes the people don't realize the extension of this phenomenon. The Holocaust wasn't only the building of some camps where the people were put to die or to kill instantly. There was a big structure behind, many people working just for it, a great long-term preparation and execution, and a whole system working.
In fact, it reflects the real idealism of the nazi regim. Because more than the Economic or Political Changes, the basic principle of the nazist regime was the the segregation and the xenophobia.

So, how did it started? The tortures against the jewish started far before the opening of the concentration camps, when the Nazi party and its leader, Adolf Hitler, came to the power in 1933. In that time, Germany was facing a extremly bad economic, social and political situation, and a huge humiliation caused by the World War I. So, for Hitler the big responsibles for that were the jews, knowing by a people that can become rich very fast, that were taking away the opportunities for the Germans. The jewish turned into the Germany's main enemies. Before the massive deaths in the Holocaust, a long process was made. First all the jews were registrated and forced to use a specific symbol. They were humiliated and let to die in the most miserable conditions. And no one was saved: even the old, the women and the small kids.



Pictures from Dachau, The first concentration camp opened in 1993
The Nazi regime started to create the concentration camps: but initially they were just a few and weren't the most important element of the regime's xenophobia.
The big part of the jewish population started to be concentrated in the big cities, in Germany and in the occupied territories (especially Poland, Austria and Czechoslovakia). Many jews from the countries came to the cities and were put in the ghettos: urban districts separated from the rest of the cities, where only the jews could live. They were deprived of all their rights and became employees of the German industry.
Evacuation of the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943
However the big intention of Hitler wasn't leave the jews in these ghettos. He intended to invade the Soviet Union and put them - the jews and the other discriminated groups - in Siberia. But, when Hitler failed to invade the Soviet Union, Hitler turned to the massive creation of concentration and extermination camps. The ghettos were evacuated until 1943, and the jews were taken to these concentration camps.
But now, not only the jews are being arrested, but also members of other groups: gypsies, homosexuals, politicians (especially Hitler opponents), priests and other members of the Catholic church, black people,
Soviets massively murdered in Belarus
people from the occupied territories who were considered inferiors, and physical and mental disabled.
Many concentration camps were opened in Germany and the occupied territories. The living conditions in the forced labour or concentration camps was extremely bad. The physical and psychological terror were a constant by day and by night. The prisioners were constantly fearing by their lifes. And of course, all the work was completly unecessary and had only one purpose: to humiliate and to weaken the prisioners until the death, usually some weeks after they arrived to the camps. Of course, many other prisioners were killed by massive shootings, physical and psychological tortures and starvation.
Entrance to Aushcwitz-Birkeneau camp
In 1942 started the construction of the first extermination camps, like Treblinka, Berzec and Sobibor. Big ovens were built, as the destination of the people that arrived by trains in terrible conditions - many of them dying before the end of the travel -, and were killed in a couple of hours. The most common way to the quick death was the use of toxic gases.
Later, also the forced labour camps become extermination camps, as a consequence of the so called Final Solution decided in the Wannsee Conference (1942). In this conference it was decided that there was only one "good solution" (in the nazi way) for the jewish problem: take all the jews present in the nazi territory and bring them to the extermination camps to be killed quickly (some of them could work under extreme conditions until their death). The objective was to kill all the jewish population, in the so called genocide.

But of course not all of the prisioners had this treatment: some of them were considered "special" prisioners and didn't pass by this slow death process. Prisioners like politicians, militaries, special members of the church, high-educated people and others that didn't belong to the groups to be exterminated. In fact, many germans that weren't jews, gypsies, homossexuals, etc, were arrested - usually by the opposition to Hitler's government - and were sent to these camps, not having to work on them or die in the gas chambers.

Victims of starvation

Victim of the nazi medical experiments
The nazis abused of the prisioners in other way. Many doctors and scientists used the prisioners as guinea pigs for medical experiments. For example the homossexuals were tested to see why did they have a
different sexual orientation, and many mental disables to study they diseases. The medical experiments brought some considerable results to the scientific community. However, they were obtained by the less human way: abusing, torturing and making the tests without the person's agreement.

During the World War II, when the Nazis realized that the things could not be going as they wished, and the possibility of loosing the war started to be a reality, the death of prisoners increased a lot. The activity of the gas chambers was continuous. In Auschwitz about 8000 people were killed by day, during the final solution, and arrived to 15000 in the last year the camp was used.

The persons that survived from the concentration camps were never looking like before
When the soviet troops released these camps, they were shocked about what they saw. And very quickly the world was in shock too. It's true that the population wasn't allowed to visit the camps, and they were very far away from the cities. And obviously in the occupied countries, especially in Poland, the population was against them. And what about the german population? Even not being authorised to visit the camps, it was obvious for everyone that the things that were happening inside these camps weren't good. Despite the fact that the people were in shocked when they discovered the extreme barbaric conditions of the camps, the true is that the german population was indifferent about was going on in the camps. The anti-Semitism wasn't only a crazy idea of the members of the Nazist party. The German population was in general extremly anti-semitic. They just didn't care about the destination given to the jews or to the other groups of prisioners. For them, the killing of these people was a benefit for the society. They were more worried about the war.

Gas chambers.


So, what happened after the release of these camps? Did the deaths stop immediatly? No. The soviet troops were busy in fighting the nazis and to arrive to Berlin. The most near cities to the camps, were devastated. And the prisioners didn't have anything - just the clothes they were wearing. So in many cases, after the release, the prisioners came back to the camps. Of course it was a bad idea, because many of them commited suicide. The nazis were cruel, but they didn't know anything about the soviets. Without knowing what could happen to them, many of the prisioners killed themselves.

The world is still in shock everytime the theme of the Holocaust is discussed. And it should be. In Dachau, even decades after its close, I could feel that there wasn't no hope inside the walls. The happiness, the joy, the fun... remained beyond the walls. In total, about 15000 camps were created by the nazists, among big camps, supporting camps, forced labour camps and extermination camps.
No one can imagine the horror lived in these camps. The prisioners weren't human beings anymore. They became less than a living creature.
Should these concentration camps be preserved as a memory of what the human being can do to himself, even in the center of the Western civilization.
There's no words to describe this atrocity and unfortunately there have been similar cases like this after the end of the World War II in many countries around the world.
I just hope that this could come to an end, in honour of these innocent people. These kind of cruelties only destroy the Human kind and the best we have: the respect for the others, and the richness of being different.





"There our troops found sights, sounds, and stenches horrible beyond belief, cruelties so enormous as to be incomprehensible to the normal mind."
Words of the Colonel William W. Quinn of the US 7th Army about what he discovered in the Dachau concentration camp.

quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2014

Eurovision: Destination - Copenhagen 2014 (I)

Last year was impossible to me to put my comments about all the countries that participated in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013. Now, here I am trying to comment the songs for this year.
Let's see if this year I will present all my comments.
Let's start with the countries that have selected their songs and artists last year.

Ukraine and Maria Yaremchuk

Font: eurovisiontimes.wordpress.com

Last year Ukraine came back to the TOP3, finishing in 3rd place, with a beautiful song, and it best result since 2008.
However, last year's song was quite different from the style that Ukraine usually sends to Eurovision. But this year the old Ukraine is back. Unfortunately for me, it left some of the quality away. Of course it's too early to say if this song will be well-succeed in the Eurovision, since only 3 countries have selected, so far, their artists and songs. But I can assure than it will be almost impossible to Ukraine to obtain the same 3rd place as last year.
As for the direct competition, the 2nd ranked, Victoria Petrik with the song "Love is Lord", could be a good bet to the Eurovision. I can't say the same about the 3rd ranked, Viktor Romanchenko.
But at least the winning song, is a song that the people can remember best when will be the time to vote. And of course Maria is very carismatic on stage, and has a tuned vocal tract. We can wait a good show from Ukraine. Because as usual, even with lower quality songs, Ukraine always brings great shows to the Eurovision stage.
Ukraine will be in the grand final again, because of the song and of course because Ukraine will have voting on the same semi-final, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Moldova, Portugal and Spain.

Albania and Herciana Matmuja


For me Albania is a very particular country in the Eurovision. It started by sending good songs (or at least at an average-quality level), and since 2011 they are sending a crap song followed by a good song. The big surprise of me was on 2012. Rona Nishliu had a great voice indeed, but only a few people could think on giving her the 5th place, which shows that the song was appreciate not only buy the juries, but also by the public.
After the bad song selected by Albania, it seems that this year, this balcanic country made a better choice. At least, is far better than the last year.
It's an interisting sing, with some unexpected changes especially in the beginnig, and with an interesting mix of instruments and styles. However, this makes more difficult to understand the song. Many people could not understand the meaning of the song. This doesn't mean that the song doesn't have a strong message. The problem is that the song's structure doesn't allow the singer to show that.
Despite the fact that will be a little difficult for the people to remember and to identify themselves with the music, when will be the time to vote, at least it's originality is an extra factor that the 2nd and 3rd ranked didn't have.
Herciana has a good voice, but anything special. A place in the grand final will be more thanks to the juries than thanks to the public. And if Albania wants a place in the grand final, needs to invest a lot on the stage presentation, since the orchestra present in the national final is not allowed, and only Montenegro is the only country that usuallt gives some points to Albania, and will vote in the first semi-final. The countries that usually give many points to Albania will not participate (like Croatia and Turkey) or will be in the other semi-final (like Greece, Macedonia, Switzerland and Austria).
Unlike Ukraine, I need to see more songs to see if Albania will have good chances to go to the final. But in a semifinal where will be the gigants of the Eastern block, it will be a very hard work.



Good luck for both countries.
At least we are starting better than last year.